Skip to main content

Guns - Nothing Will Change

Well, another mass shooting.
Of course, we pray for the souls of those who were killed.  58 so far have died.
Of course, we pray for healing for the more than 500 who were wounded. 
Of course, as always, nothing will change.
Well... stock went up in two gun manufacturing corporations.   Other than that, I can’t see a blessed thing changing.  The gun interests are too strong in the United States.  Their goal is zero regulation of guns of any sort, zero limitations.  And at this point, they’ve pretty much got it.
Now, I’ve been in conversations with gun lovers who complain that the US has too many gun laws, that we are the most heavily regulated country when it comes to guns, that Chicago’s draconian gun laws don’t protect their citizens even a little.
Their point is that gun laws don’t work.  THAT must be why they spend so much money and energy trying to shoot down proposed laws in congress.  
Although I don’t believe that a thing will change, I DO believe that things could.  I do believe that gun deaths could be dramatically reduced - whether it be accidental, a crime of passion, shootings in the commission of another crime, or the inevitable mass shooting.  
What would it take?  Nation-wide gun laws - each law applying everywhere in the country.  The patchwork of laws around the country mean that the strictest laws are easily side-stepped by just going to a different city or state.  There’s no border patrol at state lines, so there’s nobody to make sure you don’t transport them into a state with stricter laws.
Then there are the exemptions for private sales or for gun show sales.  What if there were a nation-wide one-month (or even one-week) waiting period?  What if there were a nation-wide ban on anything that might be mistaken for a military assault-style weapon (AR-15, for example).  What if there were a nation-wide requirement that every gun owner pass an annual (or even every-five-year) test and had to be insured in the same way that car owners have to be insured?  What if there were a nation-wide ban on those who were ever convicted of a violent crime ever again owning a gun?  What if there were a ban on those who are under care for mental illness from owning a gun - at least until their doctor declares them fit?  
There are many other “what ifs,” but none of them will ever make a difference.  As one guy I went to high school with said on Facebook, “No waiting period!  I’m not giving up my rights for someone else.”  
That’s the country we live in.  I want my rights to have my toys, and screw the rest of you.  And I do not exaggerate.  It really and truly is a “screw the rest of you” attitude.  That is one of the hallmark’s of American society.  Don’t tell me what to do.  If I want it, I deserve it.  Nobody else matters but me.
Another defining mark of Americans is that we do not trust other people.  Or to be precise, we see virtually everyone else as a potential threat.  By that I mean that this is our default, our starting point - do not trust, be ready to strike, be ready to win.  We raise our children to see others as the enemy.  (I remember studying in Germany and trying to describe “school spirit” and “rival schools.”  It completely baffled them, struggle as they might to understand why one school would see another as the enemy).  So if we see everyone else as a potential enemy, there can be little wonder that we are so ready to bring deadly force to bear.
That’s one big reason (beyond the “I want it, so I deserve it” attitude) why so many Americans want to carry guns with them at all times.  
But all the gun ownership in the world (certainly in the country) will not stop the violence, accidental or intentional.  We will continue to have more gun deaths than anywhere else in the world that’s not the site of a war.  We will continue to have mass shootings and gang shootings and accidental shootings and police shootings and suicide shootings and shootings of passion...
Las Vegas will change nothing.  
Until enough people in this country have a spiritual awakening - or conversion - they will cling to their efforts to be the “good guy with a gun”, thinking that will actually solve anything.  
What else won’t change is the fact that all those guns in our possession will do more harm than good.  The number of bad guys thwarted by good guys with a gun (who aren’t cops) is dwarfed by the number of good guys with a gun who accidentally shoot an innocent person - sometimes their own child.  You just can’t rest fast enough when something like Las Vegas happens.  All those people could have been packing, and it would not have stopped the carnage even a bit.  The element of surprise makes all those guns meaningless.
But again, people will continue to cling to their guns, to their fantasy of saving the day and ridding the world of one more bad guy, to “protecting” themselves.  Statistically, of course, gun owners are no safer than people who never carry a gun (and might be less safe), but that will change nothing.
Nothing will change because this is America, and my right to own guns is more important than someone else’s right to live.  

So go pray, if you want.  But be warned - I don’t think God cares if you pray for the victims of gun violence unless you are also willing to do something about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It’s All On Kavanaugh

The Senate is set to vote on Brett Kavanaugh as early as today (Thursday, October 4), though they might wait till Friday.  The FBI turned in its report before 8:00 AM today, a whole day earlier than necessary and without interviewing many of the key players in this sham of a game. The biggest sham in the entire debacle, however, is that this is some “sh*t show” as a former high school classmate put it.  That the mean Democrats have somehow made this all up just to derail President Trump’s wonderful nominee.  They’re playing politics, say the Republicans. There are several holes in this theory, and I will try to enumerate them here as dispassionately as I can: If you want to see “playing politics” with a Supreme Court nominee, look no further than Merrick Garland.  Remember him?  He was a moderate but highly rated judge even among Republicans.  They simply chose - out of thin air - to refuse to give him a hearing.  With nearly a year before the ...

"All's Well That Ends Well?" Sermon preached on August 20, 2017

What a week it’s been, huh?  Just last Sunday, I was preaching to you about the Neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia that ended so tragically in murder and countless fights. Throughout the week, the tensions mounted with questions of what should be said about it and what constitutes free speech, and are Nazis really such bad guys anyway?   Then, yesterday, in Boston, the white supremacists were to have another rally in Boston.  If the Boston Globe is to be believed, they counted about fifty white supremacists and roughly 40,000 counter-protesters - just to show what this country really thinks of them. The bad guys - and it is fair to say from the pulpit that there is nothing good in Nazi or white supremacist ideology - were sent packing.  So, that takes care of that, right?  All’s well that ends well, right? Um… I think you know the answer to that.   If you don’t, maybe our scriptures can help.  Let's look at Joseph in Genesis. ...

My Rules of Engagement

MY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT: I have been troubled for a long time with the declining lack of civility in public discourse.  This is especially true in comment sections of nearly every forum and is particularly insidious on FaceBook.  I have been a part of this, and I’m repenting of the wrong.   Not that I will no longer comment, but I will no longer engage in the long back-and-forth’s of old.  They are not helpful - in fact, they lead to abuse of the one who might dare to stand up and disagree (regardless of what side they choose).  So, here are my new rules of engagement when it comes to controversial or charged issues.  Pray that I may faithfully adhere to them, and know that they are there because I love and respect you: In the Spirit of Matthew 18:15 , if I have a problem with what you write, I will not attack you in the comment section.  Rather, I will PM you and lay out my arguments as reasonably, civilly and lovingly as I am able.  I ...