Skip to main content

Walk Out vs Walk Up

On Wednesday, March 14, thousands of (mostly) high school students around the country walked out of their classes for 17 minutes to remember the 17 faculty and students killed one month earlier at a high school in Parkland, Florida.  The walk out was, in part, a protest of the gun violence that plagues this country, especially in the form of mass shootings.

Many around the country supported this action, including many school districts.  Schools from east to west, north to south, even participated with their students, making sure that they had safe gathering places.

Nevertheless, the action was not without controversy.  Many school districts threatened students with detention or suspension if they dared to walk out.  Student organizers received harsh criticism in the press and on social media, and some even received threats.

But one of the most insidious attacks on the Walk Out came in the form of a counter-campaign.  All over social media, you could see statements of "Walk UP, not OUT."

The Walk Up campaign, offered as a supposedly more positive alternative to the Walk Out, argued that it is better to walk up to students who are marginalized, and offer them statements of inclusion, of positive reinforcement.

That sounds good, doesn't it?

And in and of itself, it is good.

But in this context, it is worse than useless.  It is misleading and harmful.  Here's why.

The Walk Up campaign (it's not even a movement) makes a couple of dangerous assumptions.
First, it assumes that mass shootings are caused by students who have been bullied or otherwise marginalized.  This may be true in some cases, but it simply is not true in all or even most.  Bullied kids are not more likely to shoot up their schools.  So the Walk Up campaign will do nothing to stop the problem at issue - mass shootings.

Moreover, telling kids to just be nicer to each other puts the blame for the shootings on the kids.  "If only you hadn't been so mean, you wouldn't have gotten shot."  This is the classic victim blaming.  It's akin to a rape victim being blamed for wearing alluring clothing.

Second, the Walk Up campaign assumes that kids have not been practicing the Walk Up method all along.  In the last decade, I have observed a tremendous change in how bullying is dealt with in schools (yes, I am talking about public schools here, and I have had the privilege to be in the schools in a variety of capacities over the past fifteen years).   Anti-bullying training teaches kids how to spot kids who are left out, and how to include them.  This is essential what Walk Up says has not been happening.

The problem, of course, is that the improved treatment of the marginalized - and it IS much better - has not stopped mass shootings.  It has made life better for many, but it has not stopped the shootings because they are different problems.

At its worst, what the Walk Up campaign really is is a plot to discredit the Walk Out campaign, thereby blunting its effect.  It is a way of distracting from the real issue which is the ready availability of increasingly lethal weapons.

Critics have said that the Walk Out is addressing a non problem because gun violence has been going down in the US.

It has.  Even ultra-liberal documentarian Michael Moore said this (before anyone else) years ago.
But it isn't going down very much.  And mass shootings - which the Walk Out was addressing - are on the rise.

The United States is still the leader when it comes to number of deaths by gun among the wealthiest countries.  When you count the number in the tens of thousands, there is something terribly wrong.
Yet many in America - like the sponsors of the Walk Up campaign - continue to say we don't have a gun problem.  That we shouldn't have gun regulation.  That assault-style weapons are not a problem and that it's just whiny liberal snowflakes who know nothing about guns who complain.

Well, we do have a problem, and as a Christian, I can not stand idle and watch fear and threats of violence (not to mention violence itself) go unanswered.  As a Christian, I must approach such violence with non-violence, hatred and fear with love and trust in God (not in Smith & Wesson).
So, on Wednesday when the students walked out, I joined pastors across the country and tolled our church bells 17 times to remember the victims not only of Parkland but of all gun violence.  I suppose, in a sense, I did walk up, since I had to climb the stairs of the bell tower.  But make no mistake, my walk up was in full support of the Walk Out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It’s All On Kavanaugh

The Senate is set to vote on Brett Kavanaugh as early as today (Thursday, October 4), though they might wait till Friday.  The FBI turned in its report before 8:00 AM today, a whole day earlier than necessary and without interviewing many of the key players in this sham of a game. The biggest sham in the entire debacle, however, is that this is some “sh*t show” as a former high school classmate put it.  That the mean Democrats have somehow made this all up just to derail President Trump’s wonderful nominee.  They’re playing politics, say the Republicans. There are several holes in this theory, and I will try to enumerate them here as dispassionately as I can: If you want to see “playing politics” with a Supreme Court nominee, look no further than Merrick Garland.  Remember him?  He was a moderate but highly rated judge even among Republicans.  They simply chose - out of thin air - to refuse to give him a hearing.  With nearly a year before the ...

"All's Well That Ends Well?" Sermon preached on August 20, 2017

What a week it’s been, huh?  Just last Sunday, I was preaching to you about the Neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia that ended so tragically in murder and countless fights. Throughout the week, the tensions mounted with questions of what should be said about it and what constitutes free speech, and are Nazis really such bad guys anyway?   Then, yesterday, in Boston, the white supremacists were to have another rally in Boston.  If the Boston Globe is to be believed, they counted about fifty white supremacists and roughly 40,000 counter-protesters - just to show what this country really thinks of them. The bad guys - and it is fair to say from the pulpit that there is nothing good in Nazi or white supremacist ideology - were sent packing.  So, that takes care of that, right?  All’s well that ends well, right? Um… I think you know the answer to that.   If you don’t, maybe our scriptures can help.  Let's look at Joseph in Genesis. ...

My Rules of Engagement

MY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT: I have been troubled for a long time with the declining lack of civility in public discourse.  This is especially true in comment sections of nearly every forum and is particularly insidious on FaceBook.  I have been a part of this, and I’m repenting of the wrong.   Not that I will no longer comment, but I will no longer engage in the long back-and-forth’s of old.  They are not helpful - in fact, they lead to abuse of the one who might dare to stand up and disagree (regardless of what side they choose).  So, here are my new rules of engagement when it comes to controversial or charged issues.  Pray that I may faithfully adhere to them, and know that they are there because I love and respect you: In the Spirit of Matthew 18:15 , if I have a problem with what you write, I will not attack you in the comment section.  Rather, I will PM you and lay out my arguments as reasonably, civilly and lovingly as I am able.  I ...